This is a read-only snapshot of the ComputerCraft forums,
taken in April 2020.
Light table
Started by Sxw, 12 July 2013 - 07:44 PMPosted 12 July 2013 - 09:44 PM
Posted 13 July 2013 - 01:09 AM
This looks awesome!
Posted 13 July 2013 - 02:37 AM
Someone, make LighttableCraft mod…
NOW!
NOW!
Posted 13 July 2013 - 05:05 AM
Oohh! I'm going to try out the alpha! :D/>
Posted 13 July 2013 - 05:19 AM
Looks nice! I just hope that people will make good plug-ins for most languages.
Posted 13 July 2013 - 08:07 AM
Awwww…. It's not for PPC. ;(
Posted 13 July 2013 - 11:33 AM
Awwww…. It's not for PPC. ;(
How old is your computer O.o?
Posted 13 July 2013 - 07:05 PM
Awwww…. It's not for PPC. ;(
How old is your computer O.o?
I have a desktop with Windows 7… but my laptop is a Apple Powerbook G4 15" 2005 1.5gh 70gb HD and 1gb of memory. It's old, but it does it's job.
Will someone port this to PPC?
Posted 13 July 2013 - 09:13 PM
Should be simple as recompiling to PPC. Ill try.
/me searches for source.
EDIT:
It's build on node-WebKit… So… Uhhh… I dunno.
EDIT:
Are you running 10.6? If so, compile node webkit yourself and replace the binary on the .app
Good luck.
/me searches for source.
EDIT:
It's build on node-WebKit… So… Uhhh… I dunno.
EDIT:
Are you running 10.6? If so, compile node webkit yourself and replace the binary on the .app
Good luck.
Posted 14 July 2013 - 01:47 AM
I don't think you can just compile programs to be in a different architecture… If you really could, why not compile chromium to be 64 bit on windows so you won't have that stupid java problem? xD
Anywho, thanks for sharing this sxw ;)/>
Quick note to ubuntu (13.04) users, if you can't run LightTable (and you get a libudev.so missing shared library error when you try to run LightTable in terminal) the try this command in terminal
Anywho, thanks for sharing this sxw ;)/>
Quick note to ubuntu (13.04) users, if you can't run LightTable (and you get a libudev.so missing shared library error when you try to run LightTable in terminal) the try this command in terminal
sudo ln -s /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libudev.so.1 /usr/lib/libudev.so.0
The problem actually is, the libudev library location is different than what LightTable thought, so that just does a hacky symbolic link from where libudev actually is to where LightTable thinks it is.Posted 14 July 2013 - 01:50 AM
Not quite as good as Visual Studio, but I'd argue it's definitely better than Code::Blocks.
Posted 14 July 2013 - 03:47 AM
The tabbing is retarded. It just adds four spaces. That's basically the reason I'm not using it.
Posted 14 July 2013 - 04:40 AM
I don't think you can just compile programs to be in a different architecture… If you really could, why not compile chromium to be 64 bit on windows so you won't have that stupid java problem? xD
Anywho, thanks for sharing this sxw ;)/>
Quick note to ubuntu (13.04) users, if you can't run LightTable (and you get a libudev.so missing shared library error when you try to run LightTable in terminal) the try this command in terminalThe problem actually is, the libudev library location is different than what LightTable thought, so that just does a hacky symbolic link from where libudev actually is to where LightTable thinks it is.sudo ln -s /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libudev.so.1 /usr/lib/libudev.so.0
Of course you can. Though, you can't if the code is written for one specific architecture.
Posted 14 July 2013 - 09:02 AM
How can I run 10.6 on PPC? :huh:/>
Posted 15 July 2013 - 04:48 AM
How about googling?How can I run 10.6 on PPC? :huh:/>
Posted 15 July 2013 - 11:50 AM
Awesome IDE
Posted 15 July 2013 - 12:49 PM
How about googling?How can I run 10.6 on PPC? :huh:/>
I don't think I'm going to run 10.6 in a emulator on my 1.5GH G4… 10.6 is Intel only.