This is a read-only snapshot of the ComputerCraft forums, taken in April 2020.
mrdawgza's profile picture

Old Snorrful OS [Discontinued]

Started by mrdawgza, 24 September 2013 - 03:14 PM
mrdawgza #1
Posted 24 September 2013 - 05:14 PM


Old Snorrful OS is discontinued; meaning I am not releasing it - I have decided to make another OS and completely rebuild it.

!!!Old Snorrful OS is open-source, which means you can take it and improve it only. You cannot take it, edit it, then release it as your own OS.!!!

News:
Old Snorrful OS uses GitHub for the installation!


This OS is discontinued. I have released LinearOS to success this old code (Much better)

Features
SpoilerMouse click GUI
SafeBoot
SNELL Terminal (Shell)
Mouse File Browser
Programs Manager
I might be missing some …

These features are for v3 REBUILT

Screenshots
SpoilerThe Desktop


File Manager (Mouse File Browser)


Terminal (Snell Terminal - Exclusive to OSROS Rebuilt)


Settings Menu


SafeBoot Screen (Screen One)

Installation
SpoilerPastebin ID: removedForUpdates

To install directly, enter this on a advanced computer:

pastebin get [b]removedForUpdates[/b] easyDownloader

EasyDownloader downloads the actual installation file from GitHub since I can easily make changes to the version quick and clean via my repository.
If you disprove of this please tell me.

Please tell me if you find ANY bugs regarding the installer and easyDownloader!
I need to know them.

Note:
The rebuilt version of OSROS is FINALLY HERE!!!
I have been working on it for about 2 weeks now.

Version History
Spoilerv3 Rebuilt:
Spoiler
  • Complete overhaul!
  • New Terminal!
  • Configuration file
  • SafeBoot
  • Cleaner Code
  • Rebuilt from scratch.
2.2:
Spoiler
  • Fixed the random flashes on desktop
  • Fixed updater (Use it on v2.12 to update to this version!)
  • Removed the random orange bar in the options with a few improved graphics
  • Added a few functions
  • Fixed the options menu bug where if you spam clicked it would give you a nasty JAVA error
2.12:
Spoiler
  • Added a program manager
  • Login screen error
  • Updater function (Not developed, computer restarts on update)
  • A couple bug fixes
  • New bootstrapper (Pushing any key during boot aborts boot and returns to SHELL)

1.92 BETA:
Spoiler
  • Old Snorrful Revolution OS development started
  • Old Snorrful Legacy OS ported to Advanced Computers
  • Added clickable GUIs

What is SafeBoot?
SpoilerSafe boot is sorta like what Windows has, if you turn it off physically and turn it on it asks to boot in safe mode,
Safe Boot works the same way. When you start your computer, a file; session.ossf is created, and upon reboot or shutdown is deleted.
If this file exists on boot, it will display a screen which will boot SHELL after five seconds unless you push any key. Pushing any key will boot OSROS.
SafeBoot also verifies if you have all your system files. If you don't then it will prompt to reinstall the OS. (NOT RELEASED)

What if I don't want to boot OSROS upon startup?
SpoilerYou can easily get passed this! Just head to settings and look around in Boot Behaviour.

What if I don't want to use SafeBoot upon startup?
SpoilerI like SafeBoot, I wouldn't recommend disabling it because you may install a file that corrupts stuff on the computer, and it verifies your system files.
To disable it, SETTINGS > SAFEBOOT > DISABLE.

To-Do List:
Spoiler
  • Fix the program manager install bug.
  • Add more features.
  • Add the Command Center.
  • Add an update function.


Please address bugs found in a reply.

If you have any suggestions, please tell me them.


Snorrful Systems
Edited on 12 October 2014 - 09:32 PM
PixelToast #2
Posted 24 September 2013 - 05:32 PM
from the description and snapshots it looks meh .-.
ive made more elaborate and functional systems in batch
only 4-6 hours of programming?
no colors? :(/>
"Please don't take it and claim it as your own work." not to be mean, but why would anyone want to?

oh and

great
mrdawgza #3
Posted 24 September 2013 - 05:38 PM
from the description and snapshots it looks meh .-.
ive made more elaborate and functional systems in batch
only 4-6 hours of programming?
no colors? :(/>
"Please don't take it and claim it as your own work." not to be mean, but why would anyone want to?

oh and

great
The link should be fixed now.
1st. How long would it take?
2nd. Read the description, I said I prefer old computers.
3rd. I guess I came from a world where editing and claiming others work often occurs.
PixelToast #4
Posted 24 September 2013 - 07:36 PM
i just downloaded it, way too many fake loading screens
Edited by
mrdawgza #5
Posted 25 September 2013 - 03:27 AM
i just downloaded it, way too many fake loading screens

Fake? Not following.
Too many? I count one.
Tell me what you mean fake.
Should it do something with the loading bar? If so, what?
theoriginalbit #6
Posted 25 September 2013 - 04:56 AM
Suggestions:
  1. Remove 99% of the sleeps [OS]
  2. Remove 100% of the sleeps [Installer]
  3. Add in some termination prevention, currently every part of your system allows for the OS to be stopped and the user to return to the shell [installer & OS]
  4. Getting undesired input should not shutdown the computer, it should just ask for input again [installer]
  5. Lots of programs, and high complexity, consider using 1 program and lots of functions [OS]
  6. Remove the 21.2 second loading (loading bars should show progress of loading, if loading actually took 21 seconds, fair enough, but this is a waste of users time) [startup]
  7. If you want it run off a floppy disk, validate that it is being run off one [startup]
  8. Don't lie to a user, if you say "saving your settings" actually have settings to save [mainmenu & options]
  9. Remove recursive program running, use loops [mainmenu, preal]
  10. Was this deliberate?
    print("If you have found any bugs/spelling errors or")
    		print("  punctuation erros please tell me on the thread")
  11. Todo List program is deceptive, makes user think they can make a todo, when its the remaining features to code in the OS
  12. The help program is pointless, if you're not going to help someone, remove it, clearly they opened the help program for a reason
  13. Localize your variables! [everywhere!]
  14. Use lookup tables for accounts, much more efficient (you can find lots of info about login systems in AaP, I know I've personally answered about 1/2 a dozen of them) [login]
  15. shell.run("pastebin get yfcXZJti accounts")
    This paste has been removed
    [installer]
  16. shell.run("install")
    what if they didn't call the program install, this is why loops are important! [installer]
mrdawgza #7
Posted 25 September 2013 - 06:24 AM
Great list of suggestions. Busy on them now, hopefully some of them will be in the rb2.7 BETA version.
About the termination prevention, I'm leaving it off during the beta stage.

I have updated the OS, installer with most of the suggestions provided by theoriginalbit.
The installation takes place a lot more quicker and, I removed the 21 second loading bar :P/>/>
Its now about 5-6 seconds. (I think, I guessed)
nutcase84 #8
Posted 26 September 2013 - 06:30 PM
Please note you need html.get API to install this operating system!

html.get? You mean the HTTP API?
mrdawgza #9
Posted 27 September 2013 - 08:11 AM
Please note you need html.get API to install this operating system!

html.get? You mean the HTTP API?

Yes, yes I do.

Also, my latest version has been released.
Gvin #10
Posted 27 September 2013 - 09:29 AM
Is it just a new menu? Do you use encryption or hashing for stored passwords?
mrdawgza #11
Posted 27 September 2013 - 09:36 AM
Is it just a new menu? Do you use encryption or hashing for stored passwords?

There are multiple new menus, and I am working on the password encryption and hashing. (If you want help me PM me)
mrdawgza #12
Posted 06 October 2013 - 08:36 AM
Version rb4 out!
New:
-Password Encryption
-Update function
-CTRL+T prevention.
Gvin #13
Posted 06 October 2013 - 08:44 AM
Version rb4 out!
New:
-Password Encryption
-Update function
-CTRL+T prevention.

Password encryption is really important thing! Only a few OSes here has such feature! Which encryption algorithm do you use?
mrdawgza #14
Posted 06 October 2013 - 09:32 AM
Version rb4 out!
New:
-Password Encryption
-Update function
-CTRL+T prevention.

Password encryption is really important thing! Only a few OSes here has such feature! Which encryption algorithm do you use?

sha256 by GravityScore - Topic

Anyone got any suggestions? I'm currently working on a notepad or word processor, so if you want to help me go ahead :P/>
theoriginalbit #15
Posted 06 October 2013 - 09:50 AM
sha256 by GravityScore - Topic
SHA256 is not an encryption, it is hashing, these are very different things!

Hashing is designed to turn a string, irrelevant of its size, into a fixed length string that represents the first. This process is one-way, meaning that once you've hashed a string, you cannot reverse the process.
Encryption is designed to be two-way, data is taken in, along with some form of key, this key is applied to the data through an encryption process and a new string is produced. Then later this same key is able to be applied to the data again through a decryption process and the origin string is retrieved.

A good link on the matter. Another link that puts it very simply.
mrdawgza #16
Posted 06 October 2013 - 09:54 AM
sha256 by GravityScore - Topic
SHA256 is not an encryption, it is hashing, these are very different things!

Hashing is designed to turn a string, irrelevant of its size, into a fixed length string that represents the first. This process is one-way, meaning that once you've hashed a string, you cannot reverse the process.
Encryption is designed to be two-way, data is taken in, along with some form of key, this key is applied to the data through an encryption process and a new string is produced. Then later this same key is able to be applied to the data again through a decryption process and the origin string is retrieved.

A good link on the matter. Another link that puts it very simply.

Ahah, well, I like to call it encryption because it sounds cool :P/>
Ill try change it..
Although, is hashing better or worse (worse meaning read)?
theoriginalbit #17
Posted 06 October 2013 - 10:01 AM
Although, is hashing better or worse (worse meaning read)?
Since there is no need to ever reverse the password, since all you need to do is hash the users input and compare against the stored password, hashing is the better method to choose (also since CC programs are open-source encryption wouldn't be overly secure).
mrdawgza #18
Posted 06 October 2013 - 10:23 AM
Although, is hashing better or worse (worse meaning read)?
Since there is no need to ever reverse the password, since all you need to do is hash the users input and compare against the stored password, hashing is the better method to choose (also since CC programs are open-source encryption wouldn't be overly secure).

Thanks, so I'll stick to hasing.

In other words, anybody have any ideas for a word processor?
I don't want to use shell.run("edit "..input) since if they want to open a saved .txt file they could open any file that the OS requires (Like mainmenu or options)
mrdawgza #19
Posted 06 October 2013 - 02:40 PM
Version rb4.2 is out!
Changes:
-Improved menus!
-A few bug fixes and improvements.

To install this update on a computer which Old Snorrful OS was previously installed on, head to Update in the options menu. To install this update on a
new computer, download and run the installer!
(The code is A LOT more messier and harder to read)
nutcase84 #20
Posted 10 October 2013 - 08:41 PM
Although, is hashing better or worse (worse meaning read)?
Since there is no need to ever reverse the password, since all you need to do is hash the users input and compare against the stored password, hashing is the better method to choose (also since CC programs are open-source encryption wouldn't be overly secure).

Thanks, so I'll stick to hasing.

In other words, anybody have any ideas for a word processor?
I don't want to use shell.run("edit "..input) since if they want to open a saved .txt file they could open any file that the OS requires (Like mainmenu or options)

What's wrong with people looking at your code? And you can't stop it entirely, I could go into my .minecraft folder and look at your code.
mrdawgza #21
Posted 11 October 2013 - 03:07 AM
I know that I can go into my save and explore ect…
But on Windows or something you can't open a system file in Notepad…(That sounded stupid)
So that's why I've decided to use a table for the txt and name the table the txt name ect ect.
mrdawgza #22
Posted 22 October 2013 - 08:24 PM
Hey guys, Old Snorrful has been updated TO ADVANCED COMPUTERS! Whooo!
Try it now by downloading the attachment called OSROS BETA 1.92 and put that in a new computer folder.
Sorry that there is not a installer at the moment, I'll try make one tomorrow.
mrdawgza #23
Posted 23 October 2013 - 04:36 AM
Any feedback?
mrdawgza #24
Posted 27 October 2013 - 01:24 PM
Ok, not to bump or anything, but does anyone have anything to say about the conversion?
Anything to advise about the desktop, a little feedback would be nice to tell me if it's worth working on…
PixelToast #25
Posted 27 October 2013 - 04:03 PM
things i dont like
  1. not enough programs
  2. cyan
  3. orange
  4. changing username does not copy all the user information, causing it to crash when you log in again
things i do like
  1. you can terminate the first part of the startup
  2. the menu calling is recursive, i can go into the login screen and hold down enter and crash it
  3. anyone can make an account
  4. firewolf does not work
mrdawgza #26
Posted 27 October 2013 - 04:39 PM
things i dont like
  1. not enough programs
  2. cyan
  3. orange
  4. changing username does not copy all the user information, causing it to crash when you log in again
things i do like
  1. you can terminate the first part of the startup
  2. the menu calling is recursive, i can go into the login screen and hold down enter and crash it
  3. anyone can make an account
  4. firewolf does not work

I'm working on a program manager and more user customization.
I'll fix the userfiles rename problem.

Terminating the first part of the startup, wait wait I'm lost, is that a good or bad thing? ((OHH I get it - sarcasm -_-/>))
The login hold enter crash thingy can be fixed, I was just to lazy at the time to add a cancel button.
Anyone can make an account, so can anyone on the forums, problem?
Why doesn't Firewolf work?
Edited on 05 December 2014 - 11:40 AM
mrdawgza #27
Posted 27 October 2013 - 06:52 PM
Ok, version 2.12 is out!
Whats new?
  • If wrong login information is given, an error screen shows
  • A super easy program manager, allowing you to install programs from Pastebin and delete them!
  • An update program (Implemented, not developed - Using it will reboot computer with no difference)
  • A couple bug fixes
To get this awesome just reinstall the installer and then reinstall the OS. I know it sounds like a mess but it's the only
way to do it since the updater don't work now. (I would work on it but I have exams and stuff)
mrdawgza #28
Posted 28 October 2013 - 02:25 PM
Version 2.2 is out!

Whats new?
  • A couple bug fixes
  • A couple improvements
  • Fixed desktop flashing
  • Fixed options menu JAVA error
  • Updated installer
To get this snorrtastic update, just run the installer on OSROS 1.92 BETA or later versions!
TheGamerOfAction #29
Posted 29 October 2013 - 02:45 PM
I quite like the OS, but I have found a bug with exiting FireWolf not returning to the OS and instead freezing the whole computer. Oh, and support for different screen sizes using term.getSize() would be nice, because I use screen size 35x110, so the whole OS is squashed in one corner.
mrdawgza #30
Posted 30 October 2013 - 06:07 AM
I quite like the OS, but I have found a bug with exiting FireWolf not returning to the OS and instead freezing the whole computer. Oh, and support for different screen sizes using term.getSize() would be nice, because I use screen size 35x110, so the whole OS is squashed in one corner.

I am working on the Firewolf bug, and I'l look into the sizes.
Also, Firewolf is a program installed with the OS, you can install programs from Pastebin and uninstall them when you want, just don't delete all of them, leave one or the program manager won't have anything to list and it won't listen to any inputs.
Gvin #31
Posted 30 October 2013 - 08:19 AM
Some question about the realization:
What is the role of profile in your OS? It simply stores the configuration (colors and background for example) or an user has some protected "home" folder to store his/her files?
mrdawgza #32
Posted 30 October 2013 - 08:39 AM
Some question about the realization:
What is the role of profile in your OS? It simply stores the configuration (colors and background for example) or an user has some protected "home" folder to store his/her files?

At the moment, it's there just for custom wallpapers. But in the next release it will store texts from a word processor and pictures from paint. I'm also trying to make each secure.
Gvin #33
Posted 30 October 2013 - 08:53 AM
At the moment, it's there just for custom wallpapers. But in the next release it will store texts from a word processor and pictures from paint. I'm also trying to make each secure.
Its sad that there is no possibility to prevent some things like autolaunching the "startup" file from the disk before the main "startup" file. If it were possible you could realy make user folders secure inside your system. But because of this I see the only way to implement this - encryption! Or maybe you've found another solution?
mrdawgza #34
Posted 30 October 2013 - 08:56 AM
At the moment, it's there just for custom wallpapers. But in the next release it will store texts from a word processor and pictures from paint. I'm also trying to make each secure.
Its sad that there is no possibility to prevent some things like autolaunching the "startup" file from the disk before the main "startup" file. If it were possible you could realy make user folders secure inside your system. But because of this I see the only way to implement this - encryption! Or maybe you've found another solution?

I've given it a lot of thought, I thought something like, if the folder name matches the current user (API set from login) then it'll allow him to go in, otherwise kick him out.
But I can't think of a way to prevent it from the Windows Explorer or whatever you use.
Wobbo #35
Posted 31 October 2013 - 03:19 PM
At the moment, it's there just for custom wallpapers. But in the next release it will store texts from a word processor and pictures from paint. I'm also trying to make each secure.
Its sad that there is no possibility to prevent some things like autolaunching the "startup" file from the disk before the main "startup" file. If it were possible you could realy make user folders secure inside your system. But because of this I see the only way to implement this - encryption! Or maybe you've found another solution?

I've given it a lot of thought, I thought something like, if the folder name matches the current user (API set from login) then it'll allow him to go in, otherwise kick him out.
But I can't think of a way to prevent it from the Windows Explorer or whatever you use.

You could build a large table that has permissions for each file/folder. Then you would need to inject a lot of functions to see is the current user is allowed to open a file using that table. It isn't really practical, but it could work.

Another, similar approach would be to store a serialised, encrypted table in each directory with the permissions, but you would have to load that table each time a file is accessed. But encryption is probably the best way to go indeed.

If you only check for home folders, it would be impossible for users to change system wide settings. I haven't tried your OS yet, but it doesn't sound like a wanted feature.
mrdawgza #36
Posted 01 November 2013 - 01:49 AM
At the moment, it's there just for custom wallpapers. But in the next release it will store texts from a word processor and pictures from paint. I'm also trying to make each secure.
Its sad that there is no possibility to prevent some things like autolaunching the "startup" file from the disk before the main "startup" file. If it were possible you could realy make user folders secure inside your system. But because of this I see the only way to implement this - encryption! Or maybe you've found another solution?

I've given it a lot of thought, I thought something like, if the folder name matches the current user (API set from login) then it'll allow him to go in, otherwise kick him out.
But I can't think of a way to prevent it from the Windows Explorer or whatever you use.

You could build a large table that has permissions for each file/folder. Then you would need to inject a lot of functions to see is the current user is allowed to open a file using that table. It isn't really practical, but it could work.

Another, similar approach would be to store a serialised, encrypted table in each directory with the permissions, but you would have to load that table each time a file is accessed. But encryption is probably the best way to go indeed.

If you only check for home folders, it would be impossible for users to change system wide settings. I haven't tried your OS yet, but it doesn't sound like a wanted feature.

I'm working on it with Gvin (I think).
Wobbo #37
Posted 02 November 2013 - 05:59 AM
-snip-

I'm working on it with Gvin (I think).

I am interested in seeing how you will get it to work.

Also, I downloaded your OS, it looks good. However, when you create a new account and type in your password, it shows what you typed in. It doesn't do this with login, so it is just a minor issue.

Also, when you boot into SHELL, can you launch to guy by hand? or is that impossible?
mrdawgza #38
Posted 02 November 2013 - 07:54 AM
-snip-

I'm working on it with Gvin (I think).

I am interested in seeing how you will get it to work.

Also, I downloaded your OS, it looks good. However, when you create a new account and type in your password, it shows what you typed in. It doesn't do this with login, so it is just a minor issue.

Also, when you boot into SHELL, can you launch to guy by hand? or is that impossible?

Alright, when you say launch to guy, what do you mean guy?
Anyway, I never got around to hiding the registration password… :P/>
Wobbo #39
Posted 02 November 2013 - 08:25 AM
-snip-

Alright, when you say launch to guy, what do you mean guy?
Anyway, I never got around to hiding the registration password… :P/>

gui >.< Can you get into the gui after you boot into the SHELL? Except for running startup again off course.
mrdawgza #40
Posted 02 November 2013 - 08:53 AM
Yes, you can. The startup program is like a bootstrapper - All it does it set the OS version with ver = 1 for the session and runs the next program.
Now since you mentioned it, if you skip the startup and load SHELL (if you have immense speed to beat the variable) it will cause errors later on in the OS..
So I'll make it load the variable in the functions program.

Anyway to load the OS after you boot SHELL, just run system/functions and the functions and APIs will load then show the main screen.


–Edit: Making it look neater..
mrdawgza #41
Posted 03 November 2013 - 03:01 PM
Hello, I am recoding OSROS.
So if you have any suggestions that you want in the rebuilt version just tell me.
Also stuff you want in.
I plan to make it easier to add features, and make the OS more, jailbroken. At the moment, it's an OS for a blonde, and it's jailed since it only allows you to do what I coded it to.
mrdawgza #42
Posted 05 November 2013 - 07:36 AM
Old Snorrful Revolution Rebuilt is on its way!
What to expect:
-snellTerminal (terminal, shell)
-No user system
-More user friendly
-Clean code
-Less jailed
-Boot manager (choose what to boot; CraftOS, OSROS or any other)
-Desktop icons
-File manager
Have any suggestions that I could add?

EDIT - Made it look a lot more neater
Edited on 07 November 2013 - 09:03 AM
mrdawgza #43
Posted 16 November 2013 - 04:18 PM
Version OSROS v3 Rebuilt RELEASED!
Whats new?
  • SNELL Terminal
  • Mouse File Browser
  • Rebuilt from scratch
  • Configuration file
  • SafeBoot
  • Cleaner code
Please tell me about bugs, it helps :D/>
mrdawgza #44
Posted 02 December 2013 - 05:29 PM
To be honest; I've ran out of ideas to put into my OS - I mean; I need something to work on - Currently I have a version to be released but I want some more features to it so I don't keep rolling out too many updates.
Could someone give me a few suggestions on what to change or what to add? Thanks in advance.
oeed #45
Posted 03 December 2013 - 06:12 PM
To be honest; I've ran out of ideas to put into my OS - I mean; I need something to work on - Currently I have a version to be released but I want some more features to it so I don't keep rolling out too many updates.
Could someone give me a few suggestions on what to change or what to add? Thanks in advance.

I downloaded it for the first time yesterday, and the biggest problems I found were:
  • The install program thing didn't work
  • There's nothing to do, I had seen everything after about a minute
  • The safemode it completely pointless
  • Many more things I can't be bothered adding
Really, my number one suggestion is to take care in your work. 90% of the OSs on this forum are release far to early, when I make a program or OS I put as much detail and effort in to it as possible. As a result they are littered with bugs and crashes and can't do anything. So that my piece of advice, think about Apple products. The reason people love them so much is due to the huge amount of work and care they put in the products.
BillyTheCodingKid #46
Posted 03 December 2013 - 06:37 PM
great job oeed
mrdawgza #47
Posted 03 December 2013 - 06:37 PM
-snip-

I downloaded it for the first time yesterday, and the biggest problems I found were:
  • The install program thing didn't work
  • There's nothing to do, I had seen everything after about a minute
  • The safemode it completely pointless
  • Many more things I can't be bothered adding
-snip-


Alright - I don't know whats wrong with your installer - I just installed it from Pastebin fine.

There is nothing to do in that version - Since I completely rebuilt the OS from scratch; I thought I'd better release it and add more stuff later in an update.

The safemode isn't really completely pointless - I do believe I can code a little virus to shutdown the computer upon the load of desktop.ossf. It also scans to see if you are missing a system file; if so; it will attempt reinstall (to be released later)

Many more things like? It's open source (everything in CC is) so you can do what you want to improve it. To others; please don't take it and change all the names and looks then claim it as your own work.


Thank you for the tip on thinking about Apple products.

–Edit- Fixing the to be released later text.
Edited on 03 December 2013 - 05:42 PM
oeed #48
Posted 03 December 2013 - 06:43 PM
-snip-

I downloaded it for the first time yesterday, and the biggest problems I found were:
  • The install program thing didn't work
  • There's nothing to do, I had seen everything after about a minute
  • The safemode it completely pointless
  • Many more things I can't be bothered adding
-snip-


Alright - I don't know whats wrong with your installer - I just installed it from Pastebin fine.

There is nothing to do in that version - Since I completely rebuild the OS from scratch; I thought I'd better release it and add more stuff later in an update.

The safemode isn't really completely pointless - I do believe I can make a little virus to say shutdown the computer upon the load of desktop.ossf. It also scans to see if you are missing a system file; if so; it will attempt reinstall (to be released later)

Many more things like? It's open source (everything in CC is) so you can do what you want to improve it. To others; please don't take it and change all the names and looks then claim it as your own work.


Thank you.

–Edit- Fixing the to be released later text.

Sorry by installer I meant the in OS pastebin downloader, It doesn't seem to work.

I don't really know, but take a look at other OSs and make a few things/programs they have.
mrdawgza #49
Posted 03 December 2013 - 06:50 PM

-snip-
-snip-
-snip-

Many more things like? It's open source (everything in CC is) so you can do what you want to improve it. To others; please don't take it and change all the names and looks then claim it as your own work.

Thank you.

-snip-

Sorry by installer I meant the in OS pastebin downloader, It doesn't seem to work.

I don't really know, but take a look at other OSs and make a few things/programs they have.

Okay - I'm making a todo-list now because I've fixed the programs installer bug (recoded it to be exact - now you can either install via Pastebin or Github) and the uninstall bug.
I'm also working on making different color settings but it takes a lot of time and I have to make it recode the config file each color change. So that you can expect in the next two updates.

Thank you.

Anybody got any suggestions to add or anything to change?
mrdawgza #50
Posted 11 January 2014 - 09:09 AM
Hi guys - I decided to stop developing Old Snorrful OS since the name isn't so attracting and the style has been a little dead.
If you don't want me to do this say so.

The OS I'm going to start on will work the same way as Old Snorrful.
It will not look the same - BUT some features will be brought over to the new one. I am still deciding a name for it. (Update: Name is LinearOS)
PM me if you want to help development for the new OS.
Edited on 03 October 2014 - 06:47 AM
Symmetryc #51
Posted 13 January 2014 - 03:10 PM
Why don't you make it windowed? Like LyqydOS / PearOS?
oeed #52
Posted 13 January 2014 - 04:03 PM
Why don't you make it windowed? Like LyqydOS / PearOS?

Windows really aren't the future in CC. The screens just too small.
Symmetryc #53
Posted 13 January 2014 - 04:10 PM
Why don't you make it windowed? Like LyqydOS / PearOS?

Windows really aren't the future in CC. The screens just too small.
Why make windows + tabs, sort of like how you can create multiple Chrome windows and each one has its own tabs. That way, you can have the features of tabs and windows in one.
mrdawgza #54
Posted 13 January 2014 - 04:29 PM
Why don't you make it windowed? Like LyqydOS / PearOS?

Windows really aren't the future in CC. The screens just too small.
Why make windows + tabs, sort of like how you can create multiple Chrome windows and each one has its own tabs. That way, you can have the features of tabs and windows in one.

I have started developing a new OS which is a mushup of the two past versions of this OS (Legacy and Revolution) but coded better and more efficient, it's not that cheesy and is going to be better overall. -You can find the new OS here.
Edited on 12 October 2014 - 09:34 PM