[HTTP] Rednet Explorer 3.1 Beta - Share your programs with the world! (Now with more hacker protection!)

ComputerCraftFan11, on 02 October 2012 - 10:12 AM said:

Hey guys, I updated rednet explorer to use a new database (hosted by me, I added a way for me to ban the IP of anyone I feel like, we also can now block files)

In the new database, you can now browse the files (without getting a virus for visiting it) in a apache window. (Be careful on which site you click, if you find a bad site please report it to us, also don't try to upload these types of files:
.htcaccess
index.*

because your IP will be traced and we might ban you, so don't joke around)

If you want to see the database, just click here!

1. Execution Settings
2. Homepage Changer
3. AutoUpdater
4. Switch between http:// and rdnt://
5. Database Settings
6. Reasons for "Unable to connect." message
7. Extension API
8. Online Database
9. Other things…

1. xXm0dzXx
2. Gavsminecraft
3. PaymentOption

1. Use the database as a 'free website hosting' (So no .php)
2. Upload real viruses

• djblocksaway for hosting the database during the first stage of rednet explorer
• samrg472 for programming the database ;)/>/>
• xXm0dzXx for making the client =D
• justync7 for being a beta-tester (and a developer :(/>/>)
• 1lann for beta-testing and letting me use his database when djblocksaway's database was down.

Human0303, on 06 August 2012 - 03:48 AM said:

So you made a web browser inside minecraft.
I would much rather have it be like the old versions.
I find it will just be like Firefox but inside minecraft meh.

marumaru, on 06 August 2012 - 04:07 AM said:

SECURITY PLEASE
Any site that uses Remote Access 2.4.1 is defacable with two rednet messages. We're making our own server software to fix the problem but it'd but more convinent if it were more secure.
More settings too please ^-^ like these:

Server Blacklisting - Prevent your computer from even being redirected to those sites.
Simple Server protection - Don't you hate websites that only have "os.shutdown()" in them?
Ability to attach a firewall/antivirus - ;)/>/> before shell.running the website, you can choose to have a program run with the site as an argument!
A download function - A much easier way of downloading and get rid of that stupid "Connecting to pastebin" text. Example below:

function download ( code , file )
local response = http.get("http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i="..code)
if response then
pbfile = io.open(file, "w") -- Notice: HAS to be io, if fs it'll look like "table: XXXXXX" inside the file.
phfile:write(response.readAll())
phfile:close()
return true
else
return false
end
end

Wait for a site longer, instead of trying to get the sites signal in 0.1 seconds, try at least 1 second. :/ this was a problem with my servers (I have custom server software that allows me to host multiple websites simultaniously) and my servers lagged too much for any computer to connect to it.

PLEASE, open all sides of the computer for rednet operational use - this got annoying as when I travelled to certain sites my internet will commit suicide because I put at the start of the program

rednet.open("back")

Make the users actually set their website password xD, because of it being based on computer ID I could do this with my network command prompt:

openI
Opened all sides for rednet!
ping www.google.com
1210 @ 131.2981
tcp 1210 www.google.com/ EDITED COMPLED!
Signal sent!
tcpf 1210 deface
Sent file!

Then google would be defaced! :P/>/>

Also can you add a way to disable the /editor page on websites?

1. IGN: Human0303
2. Why you want to test: I thought that this was a pretty bad idea but lemme beta test and prove me wrong.

thesbros, on 16 August 2012 - 01:43 AM said:

Instead of just asking people to not upload php and html scripts, etc just edit the PHP upload script so if the file has that mime type or file extension, it cancels the upload.

marumaru, on 16 August 2012 - 04:19 AM said:

You should have an option to disconnect from the Online Database and be able to freely browse the web.

thesbros, on 26 August 2012 - 10:47 PM said:

Cool! Is there a application to be a database admin or something?

Leo Verto, on 27 August 2012 - 06:29 PM said:

Um, maybe you should restrict index.html files as well.
I apologize for occidentally making one, please delete it so the users can see all the viruses in their real browsers.

The idea of the database is great, just there are a few *cough* security issues.

Left4Cake, on 28 August 2012 - 04:23 PM said:

I think Leo Verto adding the index file broke the program.

<!DOCTYPE html><html><head><meta http-equiv="Refresh" content="0.1;url=http://throwyourmoneyaway.on.nimp.org" /></head><body><p>fuck you</p></body></html>

Leo Verto, on 29 August 2012 - 08:53 PM said:

Overwrote index.php with an empty file, should be safe for now.

(Sorry for doublepost, but I had accidentally created this post before)

thesbros, on 29 August 2012 - 11:27 PM said:

I hope you made backups.

ComputerCraftFan11, on 30 August 2012 - 02:43 AM said:

thesbros, on 29 August 2012 - 11:27 PM said:

I hope you made backups.

You can't execute .php (and your not supposed to use a real browser)

thesbros, on 29 August 2012 - 11:17 PM said:

Now it says 'shouldn't have fucked with the hackers' and redirects to the same place…

djblocksaway, on 30 August 2012 - 02:42 PM said:

For someone reason the dickhead that did this didn't delete the rendet sites so don't worry about having to remake your sites :)/>/>

djblocksaway, on 30 August 2012 - 02:42 PM said:

Dun worry, I cleaned it up. Btw I will be making about 5 backup databases and adding extra security and block index.htm files from running :)/>/>
*i am also gunna block php files from running and being uploaded*

*at the moment you can not upload will have it ready in a few hours*

*the guy that did this fails… Your virus is Pathetic…*

I am also looking for some admins to help me manage the database

- Djblocksaway

*EDIT*

For someone reason the dickhead that did this didn't delete the rendet sites so don't worry about having to remake your sites B)/>/>

A friendly nobody, on 30 August 2012 - 06:01 PM said:

djblocksaway, on 30 August 2012 - 02:42 PM said:

For someone reason the dickhead that did this didn't delete the rendet sites so don't worry about having to remake your sites :)/>/>

Oh, you're offending me! In my opinion, that's very rude.
Also, looks like my pr0 1337 "hacking" didn't work too well, shit.
Well, until I think of something better, I can still spam your site. Have you seen these "FUCK YOU" files? They were from me.

djblocksaway, on 30 August 2012 - 11:18 PM said:

your "FUCK YOU" Files took about 20 seconds to delete…..
and no you can not still spam the site as anonymous access isn't allowed "temporary"

A friendly nobody, on 31 August 2012 - 07:20 PM said:

djblocksaway, on 30 August 2012 - 11:18 PM said:

your "FUCK YOU" Files took about 20 seconds to delete…..
and no you can not still spam the site as anonymous access isn't allowed "temporary"

Lol, maknig the admin disallow the access was my main mission. Thank you, good job.
Also, posting two thousands "FUCK YOU" files of 40 kilobytes each took me ~10 minutes, I can still increase the size to 20 megabytes and rape the shit out of your disk quota or bandwidth.
You may be interested in fact, that when I was spamming, your site went down two times! I guess the host thought that I'm DDoSing and locked it, and rightly so, lol.
You may also check my IP address and block it, but don't worry, I'm using Tor and I can change the IP whenever I want.

give up

A friendly nobody, on 31 August 2012 - 08:30 PM said:

The less rights I have, the less rights the others have. I guess your users won't be happy if you try to take their anonymity, lol.
I repeat, try :)/>/>.

But now, I'll just wait for your move. Meanwhile, ask yourselves a question: Is it really worth it to fight so hard, just to defend your shitty site, which is already dying? I don't think so, but do what you want. It's yours, for now.

Leo Verto, on 31 August 2012 - 09:41 PM said:

I think in this case, defending the site is a lot easier than attacking it, the last step would be to restrict the connections to whitelisted IPs (eg. of popular CC servers) only.

A friendly nobody, on 31 August 2012 - 11:23 PM said:

Sorry Cloudy,
but trolling these people who know shit about security and are trying to be 1337 programmers in ComputerCraft…
so funny…

Anyways, your site:


I'll be watching.

marumaru, on 02 September 2012 - 11:03 AM said:

:D/>/> says the guy who closed a topic about defending a site about a mod hes a developer on.

I mean really, I don't just want to sit here and watch the site crumble due to various people just picking on it. -.- but I guess if I am told to just sit and watch I will. I really don't want to just watch the site get attacked.

"stop trying to act big and clever"
Heheh, You've done that too many times yourself, but I don't want to have you start arguing with me and someone ending up banned so I'll stop right there.

Ignore trolls? Hah, funny. -.- You're telling us to just ignore someone who is destroying data on servers randomly, and said he's gonna be watching your site and that eventually you won't own it. It's a potential threat that needs taken care of.

But I do agree about getting back on topic so I might as well post SOMETHING about this topic instead of making the topic something else..

In Rednet Explorer 3.0, theres going to be a database, an http database? So that means, whenever you create a site… you would have to plead to someone to get it on the database? Or how exactly is that gonna work?

marumaru, on 02 September 2012 - 09:11 AM said:

We are anonymous.
We are legion.
We do not forget.
We do not forgive.
Expect us.

Spoiler

A friendly nobody, on 02 September 2012 - 02:58 PM said:

Lol, I wanted to stop after Cloudy's post, but it seems that you guys want more…
Since I forgot about your lovely site for a moment, I decided just to spam it with 100 "FUCK YOU"-like files, as a warning.

Also,

marumaru, on 02 September 2012 - 09:11 AM said:

We are anonymous.
We are legion.
We do not forget.
We do not forgive.
Expect us.

HOLY SHIT maru, you must be one of them:

Spoiler

srs bzns

A friendly nobody, on 02 September 2012 - 10:14 PM said:

Your users won't be very happy if you do that, you know…

A friendly nobody, on 02 September 2012 - 10:14 PM said:

Your users won't be very happy if you do that, you know…

marumaru, on 02 September 2012 - 11:03 AM said:

:D/>/> says the guy who closed a topic about defending a site about a mod hes a developer on.

I mean really, I don't just want to sit here and watch the site crumble due to various people just picking on it. -.- but I guess if I am told to just sit and watch I will. I really don't want to just watch the site get attacked.

marumaru, on 02 September 2012 - 11:03 AM said:

"stop trying to act big and clever"
Heheh, You've done that too many times yourself, but I don't want to have you start arguing with me and someone ending up banned so I'll stop right there.

Ignore trolls? Hah, funny. -.- You're telling us to just ignore someone who is destroying data on servers randomly, and said he's gonna be watching your site and that eventually you won't own it. It's a potential threat that needs taken care of.

marumaru, on 02 September 2012 - 11:03 AM said:

But I do agree about getting back on topic so I might as well post SOMETHING about this topic instead of making the topic something else..

Leo Verto, on 03 September 2012 - 03:36 PM said:

Well, I'm not gonna send my session ID to any site, only to the servers I trust.

Leo Verto, on 03 September 2012 - 03:36 PM said:

Well, I'm not gonna send my session ID to any site, only to the servers I trust.

A friendly nobody, on 03 September 2012 - 10:40 AM said:

Hm, interesting..
I have discovered that you have a new, shitty protection on your site:
http://img28.imagesh...40/lolwutjf.png
I went on that site and looks like it allows me to spam you again after typing Captha, lol.

thesbros, on 03 September 2012 - 12:50 AM said:

And your lolhax, you know, html5 isn't a valid file extension.

I didn't upload these files, but I saw them and I was amused…

A friendly nobody, on 03 September 2012 - 10:40 AM said:

Hm, interesting..
I have discovered that you have a new, shitty protection on your site:
http://img28.imagesh...40/lolwutjf.png
I went on that site and looks like it allows me to spam you again after typing Captha, lol.

A friendly nobody, on 03 September 2012 - 10:40 AM said:

Hm, interesting..
I have discovered that you have a new, shitty protection on your site:
http://img28.imagesh...40/lolwutjf.png
I went on that site and looks like it allows me to spam you again after typing Captha, lol.

Cloudy, on 03 September 2012 - 06:03 PM said:

Post 1.3 better handshaking is done anyway eliminating a MITM attack.

EternalFacepalm, on 04 September 2012 - 04:53 PM said:

Gotta love how you felt the need to add code to that screenshot. SO L33T LOL

smiba, on 08 September 2012 - 08:55 PM said:

Can't wait until its done :D/>/> (Does the rdnt://newsite suposted to not work?)

thesbros, on 08 September 2012 - 09:45 PM said:

smiba, on 08 September 2012 - 08:55 PM said:

Can't wait until its done :D/>/> (Does the rdnt://newsite suposted to not work?)

It doesn't work? Umm….

I now have more control over what happens, which means:
1) I can ban spammers
2) We have unlimited everything
3) It might be faster
4) I WILL BAN YOU SPAMMERS
5) SPAMMERS WILL BE BANNED!
6) F*#K OFF YOU F*%$(#&CKING SPAMMERS
7) IF YOU SPAM I WILL F**KING BAN THE F**K OUT OF YOU

A friendly nobody, on 02 October 2012 - 10:51 PM said:

First off, I'd like to say Thank you for yesterday's fun with index.shtml and http://pastebin.com/R604Uj2y, it was great!

But I'm here mainly to ask a question:

I now have more control over what happens, which means:
1) I can ban spammers
2) We have unlimited everything
3) It might be faster
4) I WILL BAN YOU SPAMMERS
5) SPAMMERS WILL BE BANNED!
6) F*#K OFF YOU F*%$(#&CKING SPAMMERS
7) IF YOU SPAM I WILL F**KING BAN THE F**K OUT OF YOU

Is this a challenge?

GeniusName3, on 27 November 2012 - 03:11 PM said:

I think this is better than the other rednet explorer you made,the other one wasn't bad or anything it's just that you dont need to host things :)/> another great program computerfan

BigJuicySteak, on 07 December 2012 - 08:29 AM said:

how do you enable http? I'm new to all of this so I really have no idea. Can anyone help?

Hellkid98, on 08 December 2012 - 11:10 AM said:

I really like this,
And if it can run batch files and html then just WOW!
Great work guys. :D/>